The Daleks' Master Plan - Revision history

Jon Preddle at 09:36, 9 April 2026

2026-04-09T09:36:08Z

Jon Preddle at 20:51, 19 June 2024

2024-06-19T20:51:00Z

Jon Preddle at 02:38, 10 December 2019

2019-12-10T02:38:58Z

Jon Preddle at 22:48, 17 July 2016

2016-07-17T22:48:59Z

Jon Preddle at 20:26, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T20:26:11Z

Jon Preddle at 20:25, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T20:25:25Z

Jon Preddle at 20:21, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T20:21:13Z

Jon Preddle at 20:20, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T20:20:16Z

Jon Preddle at 20:56, 30 November 2015

2015-11-30T20:56:59Z

Jon Preddle at 20:56, 30 November 2015

2015-11-30T20:56:08Z

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 **NOTE: What is particularly curious about this clip is the clip itself. '''Blue Peter''' wanted to show-case the appearance by one of its presenters in '''Doctor Who''', so what clip do they choose to show? One with the Daleks in their spaceship that leads directly into one of Peter Purves in the SPAR. It wasn't one with the Daleks and Steven in ''the same scene together'', which you'd think would be what they would go for if such a scene was available to them (and such scenes do occur in parts ten and twelve). Could it be, therefore, that by late 1971 the BBC did not actually have that many prints featuring Purves and the Daleks (not even part 3 or 6 of [[The Chase]]?), so the clip from part 3 was the best from what was already a poor selection?
 *BBC Enterprises had junked all 11 telerecording master negatives at some point between 1972 and 1974.
-*By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "stolen" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/a53c08f7455d4cf7824278f89380f326 5 November 1973]'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.
+*By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "taken" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/a53c08f7455d4cf7824278f89380f326 5 November 1973]'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.
 **See our further musings on the [[Mormon Mystery|Mormon Church recovery here]].
 *In all likelihood these were all from the set that had been sent to Australia in 1966 (and if so, had been returned to London years earlier than the 1975 bulk shipment of returns by the ABC), as it is difficult to comprehend why the BBC would have struck a second set of films for a story it could not sell. (It is a '''remote''' possibility that Enterprises had struck two sets in early 1966: one went to and remained in Australia, the other sat on the shelf in readiness for the second sale (which would have been to [[Barbados]] in 1967) but by 1971 only a couple of these were still held, otherwise you'd think '''Blue Peter''' would have used a far better choice of clips in 1971...)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
+.
-*The serial was planned as a 12-parter. However, from the stage directions in the rehearsal and camera scripts for parts six and seven, particularly with regards to the "NEXT EPISODE" captions, it would seem that by the time the serial was '''made''', it was being treated as an 11-parter (the serial would be sold as such to foreign broadcasters), but with an additional episode screened at Christmas, but only for consumption in the UK; and as such, the Christmas-themed part seven was never telerecorded.
+*The serial was planned as a 12-parter. However, from the stage directions in the rehearsal and camera scripts for parts six and seven, particularly with regards to the "NEXT EPISODE" captions, it would seem that by the time the serial was '''made''', it was being treated as an 11-parter (the serial would be sold as such to foreign broadcasters), but with an additional episode screened at Christmas, but only for consumption in the UK; and as such, the Christmas-themed part seven was never telerecorded. (Since telerecording machines needed to be booked weeks in advance, and with the episode going out on Christmas Day when no TR machine operators would be on duty, the episode could not be TRed during broadcast, as was the norm for '''Doctor Who''' in 1965. Although Enterprises could have had the episode TRed from the master video tape at a later date, it's clear that a firm decision to exclude the episode from foreign sale had been made by them many months earlier.)
-*In other words, '''The Daleks' Master Plan''' should really be regarded as an 11-parter with a special Christmas episode '''added''' for UK viewers, rather than as a 12-parter, with an episode '''removed''' from foreign sale. Put another way, it's an 11-parter which, after its sixth episode on 18 December 1965, took a fortnight's break before resuming on New Years Day 1966; meanwhile its replacement on 25 December 1965 was a one-off episode of '''Doctor Who'''...
+*'''The Daleks' Master Plan''' should therefore be regarded as an 11-parter with a special Christmas episode '''added''' for UK viewers, rather than as a 12-parter, with an episode '''removed''' from foreign sale. Or put another way, it's an 11-parter which, after its sixth episode on 18 December 1965, took a fortnight's break before resuming on New Years Day 1966; meanwhile its replacement on 25 December 1965 was a one-off episode of '''Doctor Who'''...
 * The 11-part serial (minus the Christmas 'special') was offered to [[Australia]] in '''March 1966''', along with [[Galaxy 4]], [[Mission to the Unknown]], and [[The Myth Makers]].
 * It was viewed by the Australian censors on '''13 September 1966''' - and rated with a mixture of "G" and "A" classifications, with and without cuts.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 * It is not known what happened to the Australian prints. The ABC did not 'own' the prints -- in fact they never had them in their possession at all during the processes described above. In all likelihood, they'd have been returned to the BBC's Sydney office, and were subsequently shipped back to London.
 *The '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/f60bee360975472895cd4a6c394e6bce 25 October 1971''' edition of '''Blue Peter'''] used an extract from part 3, so it's clear that the BBC had or struck a print of that episode (at least) in 1971.
-**NOTE: What is particularly curious about this clip is the clip itself. '''Blue Peter''' wanted to show-case the appearance by one of its presenters in '''Doctor Who''', so what clip do they choose to show? One with the Daleks in their spaceship that leads directly into one of Peter Purves in the SPAR. It wasn't one with the Daleks and Steven in ''the same scene together'', which you'd think would be what they would go for if such a scene was available to them (and such scenes do occur in parts ten and twelve). Could it be, therefore, that by late 1971 the BBC did not actually have that many prints featuring Purves and the Daleks (not even part 6 of [[The Chase]]?), so the clip from part 3 was the best from what was already a poor selection?
+**NOTE: What is particularly curious about this clip is the clip itself. '''Blue Peter''' wanted to show-case the appearance by one of its presenters in '''Doctor Who''', so what clip do they choose to show? One with the Daleks in their spaceship that leads directly into one of Peter Purves in the SPAR. It wasn't one with the Daleks and Steven in ''the same scene together'', which you'd think would be what they would go for if such a scene was available to them (and such scenes do occur in parts ten and twelve). Could it be, therefore, that by late 1971 the BBC did not actually have that many prints featuring Purves and the Daleks (not even part 3 or 6 of [[The Chase]]?), so the clip from part 3 was the best from what was already a poor selection?
 *BBC Enterprises had junked all 11 telerecording master negatives at some point between 1972 and 1974.
 *By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "stolen" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/a53c08f7455d4cf7824278f89380f326 5 November 1973]'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *A few months later, [[Barbados]] purchased Season 3 (see October 1967 newspaper clipping on that page); [[Mission to the Unknown]] and The Daleks' Master Plan were not available because of the Australian rejection and moratorium. It's therefore highly unlikely that the BBC would have struck any further prints of the serial in 1966 while they were awaiting word on whether a sale had been made to Australia, and certainly not during 1967 when the Dalek serials were off the catalogue.
 * It is not known what happened to the Australian prints. The ABC did not 'own' the prints -- in fact they never had them in their possession at all during the processes described above. In all likelihood, they'd have been returned to the BBC's Sydney office, and were subsequently shipped back to London.
-*The '''25 October 1971''' edition of '''Blue Peter''' used an extract from part 3, so it's clear that the BBC had or struck a print of that episode (at least) in 1971.
+*The '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/f60bee360975472895cd4a6c394e6bce 25 October 1971''' edition of '''Blue Peter'''] used an extract from part 3, so it's clear that the BBC had or struck a print of that episode (at least) in 1971.
 **NOTE: What is particularly curious about this clip is the clip itself. '''Blue Peter''' wanted to show-case the appearance by one of its presenters in '''Doctor Who''', so what clip do they choose to show? One with the Daleks in their spaceship that leads directly into one of Peter Purves in the SPAR. It wasn't one with the Daleks and Steven in ''the same scene together'', which you'd think would be what they would go for if such a scene was available to them (and such scenes do occur in parts ten and twelve). Could it be, therefore, that by late 1971 the BBC did not actually have that many prints featuring Purves and the Daleks (not even part 6 of [[The Chase]]?), so the clip from part 3 was the best from what was already a poor selection?
 *BBC Enterprises had junked all 11 telerecording master negatives at some point between 1972 and 1974.
-*By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "stolen" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''5 November 1973'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.
+*By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "stolen" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''[http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/a53c08f7455d4cf7824278f89380f326 5 November 1973]'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.
 **See our further musings on the [[Mormon Mystery|Mormon Church recovery here]].
 *In all likelihood these were all from the set that had been sent to Australia in 1966 (and if so, had been returned to London years earlier than the 1975 bulk shipment of returns by the ABC), as it is difficult to comprehend why the BBC would have struck a second set of films for a story it could not sell. (It is a '''remote''' possibility that Enterprises had struck two sets in early 1966: one went to and remained in Australia, the other sat on the shelf in readiness for the second sale (which would have been to [[Barbados]] in 1967) but by 1971 only a couple of these were still held, otherwise you'd think '''Blue Peter''' would have used a far better choice of clips in 1971...)

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 *By the time the moratorium had been lifted at the end of 1967, only [[New Zealand]] and [[Sierra Leone]], which were still lagging behind with screening the series, would have been in a position to include and schedule the serial with the rest of season three, but since neither country did buy this (and [[Mission to the Unknown]]) it must have been the cost that prevented them from doing so... (The cost of a serial was on a "per episode" basis; at 11 episodes, this was quite an expensive serial to buy.)
 *Both [[Barbados]] and [[Zambia]] had screened as far as [[The Smugglers]] by the end of 1968, and probably wouldn't have been interested in buying and screening a story out of sequence.
-* And because [[Singapore]] did not purchase season three until 1972 (as a "back-catalogue" package), it's likely that the sales rights to the 11-parter (usually five or seven years from first UK broadcast) had already lapsed and not been renewed, which would have prevented [[Singapore]] from buying the serial with the rest of the season.
+* And because [[Singapore]] did not purchase season three until 1972 (as a "back-catalogue" package), it's likely that the sales rights to the 11-parter (usually five or seven years from first UK broadcast) had already lapsed and not been renewed by the end of 1971, which would have prevented [[Singapore]] from buying the serial with the rest of the season.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *By '''mid-1973''', the BBC still retained prints of episodes 2,3, and 4 (at least), although these copies were sited at different locations around London: episode two had been taken to the BBC's film studios in Ealing (from which it was "stolen" in 1973, and subsequently returned in 2004), whereas part three was at BBC Enterprises and four was kept in the film library. Part 4 was borrowed by the '''Blue Peter''' producers for use in their tenth anniversary clip montage (broadcast on '''5 November 1973'''), but was never returned to its place of origin. At some point between '''1978''' and '''1983''', parts five and ten ended up in the basement of a Mormon church. Where they had been prior to 1978 is unknown. Whether these five prints were all part of the same set of 11 is unknown; nor is it known how they came to be separated in the first place.
 **See our further musings on the [[Mormon Mystery|Mormon Church recovery here]].
-*In all likelihood these were all from the set that had been sent to Australia in 1966 (and if so, had been returned to London years earlier than the 1975 bulk shipment of returns by the ABC), as it is difficult to comprehend why the BBC would have struck a second set of films for a story it could not sell. (It is a '''remote''' possibility that Enterprises had struck two sets in early 1966: one went to and remained in Australia, the other sat on the shelf in readiness for a second sale, but by 1971 only a couple of these were still held, otherwise you'd think '''Blue Peter''' would have used a far better choice of clips in 1971...)
+*In all likelihood these were all from the set that had been sent to Australia in 1966 (and if so, had been returned to London years earlier than the 1975 bulk shipment of returns by the ABC), as it is difficult to comprehend why the BBC would have struck a second set of films for a story it could not sell. (It is a '''remote''' possibility that Enterprises had struck two sets in early 1966: one went to and remained in Australia, the other sat on the shelf in readiness for the second sale (which would have been to [[Zambia]] in 1967) but by 1971 only a couple of these were still held, otherwise you'd think '''Blue Peter''' would have used a far better choice of clips in 1971...)
 * See also [[Hartnell Junkings]]